Showing posts with label Debussy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Debussy. Show all posts

Saturday, September 9, 2017

JMT series, part 6a (note 31, the waltz ninth)

Note 31 concerns the “waltz ninth,” certainly a familiar device to any reader of this blog or my Hearing Schubert D779n13 blog (link). I will discuss the following four compositions here, then in subsequent posts the scherzos from the first two Beethoven symphonies and the famous barcarolle in Offenbach's Tales of Hoffmann.
Debussy, Deux Arabesques, no. 2
Grieg, “An den Frühling,” op. 43, no. 6
Lalo, “Chanson de l’Alouette”
Duparc, “Phidylé” 
For reference, a simple example of the waltz ninth device: Schubert, Wiener-Damen Ländler, D734n15. The essential features are that the ninth is over the dominant and moves upward to the leading tone, not down to ^5. The freeing of the ninth from a downward "resolution" -- like the freeing of the seventh from any resolution and the stable addition of the sixth to a triad -- is a distinctive and pervasive feature of nineteenth-century music.



Debussy, Deux Arabesques, no. 2. No comment in the note. Here is the first theme period (after a short introduction) -- it's 10 bars, presented as 4 + 6. One might call it a presentation + consequent "hybrid" rather than a period if you decide that bars 3-4 are variants of the basic idea, not contrasting. Hard to say, really. Same with the focal tone, if any, in the right hand--could be either ^5 or ^3. I am inclined, therefore, to hear them both (I write at some length about complex upper voices here: link). Note the internal (?) rising cadence gesture in the final bar of the example (and close of the A-section).


Here is the approach to the structural cadence. Under normal circumstances, I would take the boxed bars as the structural cadence, but in a common nineteenth-century gambit Debussy undermines it by hollowing out the melody and forcing a long diminuendo. All this would still have been good enough but he then gives us a resounding traditional cadence later, with a steady crescendo this time, a stretched out IV-V-I -- see circled notes -- and enriched texture.

The waltz ninth figure in shown in the small box: there is a chord on the beat with ^6 but the whole thing obviously lies within an extended dominant.



Grieg, “An den Frühling,” op. 43, no. 6. No comment in the note.  For many years a favorite intermediate recital piece, "To Spring" is, I would imagine, no longer so well known. The theme, which is also the A-section, is a sentence where the bar numbers have been doubled -- that is, the basic idea is in bars 3-6, the varied repeat of the basic idea in 7-10, etc. (Caplin has an expression for this but I've never found it very congenial and so rarely can remember what it is.) The circled F#: ^5 at the beginning drops to ^3 in the continuation phrase. In the cadence, boxed, the line (now from ^2) rises to ^5.


In the final statement of the theme, Grieg sounds this cadence again, but now in the tonic key. The result is a a simple rising line with the waltz ninth: note that ^6 is over the cadential V. The deceptive close with ^8 is ironed out with a pleasantly rising chromatic figure in the coda, with the I arriving at the very end -- another example of the confusion of section and coda that is so common throughout the nineteenth century, but more and more so as the decades move on.





Lalo, “Chanson de l’Alouette.” My comment in the note: "ascent occurs in the piano." The piano's introduction puts strong emphasis on ^5 and ^6 -- at (a). The voice at first, however, is concerned only with ^5 -- at (b) -- and a stepwise descent in the upper octave -- at (c1) and (c2), where the piano picks up its initial figure again -- at (d).

 The close of the first verse follows up on the differing patterns of the voice and the accompaniment. Initially the voice rises to C5 -- at (e) -- then meets the piano's right-hand line by leaping up to G5. In the cadence the voice moves very firmly indeed from ^2 to ^1 -- at (f) -- while the piano as firmly rises from ^5 to ^8.

 The overall design, then:
Intro: 1-7
verse 1 = 8-29; piano continues through 36
-- C major clearly defined throughout, diatonic except for an excursion into A minor in the third of the poem’s four lines. Deceptive close gives C+ instead of C.

verse 2 = 37-54
-- begins in Ab major; abrupt turn to A minor in the third of of the poem’s four lines, with equally abrupt “cadence” C: vi-I.

verse 3 = 55-71; piano continues in 72-73
-- as in verse 2, but in the poem’s third line the turn toward A minor (a: V) is diverted to a firm close in Ab.

verse 4 = pickup to 74-96
--  Piano in 72-73 has an odd chord, as if B7 against an Ab pedal, but this clears out shortly to E major. Could have been a strong close in E major but stalls on B7 instead. B7 --> G7.

verse 5 = 97-122
-- strong C: V7 to start and quick return to C for reprise of the verse 1 melody; we hear it all -- see below; circled notes from the first page shown again -- but in bar 118 *neither* voice nor piano has the closing ^1, though both are assiduously prepared. Instead, both voices shoot up (the nightingale of course. . . ), the singer to ^5 (G5), the pianist to ^3 (E7).


Duparc, “Phidylé.”  My comment in the note: "In the piano, but quite clear." As the circled notes show, the voice participates in the rising figures for a while, but it is primarily the piano that works it out, reaching from B4 (the first circled note in the piano part) through Ab6 at the cadential arrival (very end of the example). At that same moment,  the voice moves as plainly as could be down from ^3.







Thursday, June 29, 2017

JMT series, part 4c (simple rising lines)

Thirty years later I am not overly impressed by my readings of the three pieces by Debussy mentioned in note 28, though each does involve rising figures, to be sure. These are Suite bergamasque, Prelude; Ballade (1890); and Valse romantique (1890).

Suite bergamasque, Prelude. My comment in note 28: "^5 is implied over the initial I; ^6 is actually given in m. 1!"  In the example below, I have shown the parallel place in the reprise. I don't think it is ^6 that Debussy is fixated on but ^2 (or ^9), as the opening of the reprise shows. The subsequent approach to the structural cadence is marked by the interaction of ^6 and this ^2, which eventually overtops its companion and, remarkably, makes a final push to ^3 while ^6 moves through ^7 to ^8. Thus, although there is a strongly expressive ascent, it is not a simple ascending Urlinie ^5 to ^8.


Debussy, Ballade [slave] (1890). My comment in note 28: "in the cadence 9-11 bars from the end, the ascent is actually a doubled inner voice." A traditional Schenkerian analysis of this piece should certainly be possible, but would require considerable effort. By and large, I think I was right about the ascent (see the first example below), but complicating factors are that it isn't clear whether this is the structural cadence, or, to put it a different way, it isn't clear if there is one at all: a page or more of E major "resolves" back into F major but the effect is that of a coda, rather than a reprise -- see the second example below. Finally, the choice of a fundamental tone for this piece would involve quite a bit of "reading into" and would always remain open to challenge.



Debussy, Valse romantique (1890). My comment in note 28: "the ascent is literally the top voice in the structural cadence, but properly an inner voice in the Ursatz." The structural cadence is at the very end -- the only simple cadence to the tonic in the piece -- and I was referring to the four bars marked with an unfolding symbol, from G4 to E5. The primary figure, though, is the uppermost voice: A6 reached dramatically in the first bar of the example, then plenty of attention to ^2 and a decisive conclusion on ^1. The ascent from ^5 to ^8 is very much a secondary feature. As with the Ballade, whether ^3 is the fundamental tone is open to discussion.



Monday, June 6, 2016

Post-Schubert Composition list

In posts last month, I introduced examples by Schubert from my PDF essay Scale Degree ^6 in the 19th Century: Ländler and Waltzes from Schubert to Herbert, published on Texas Scholar Works: link to the essay; link to the first Schubert post.

Here is a list of the compositions discussed in the final section of Part I of the essay and in Part II (“After 1850”).

Josef Lanner, “Die 28er” Ländler, op. 20
Josef Lanner, Altenburger-Ländler, op. 40
Johann Strauss, sr., Feldbleamel’n (im Ländler-Style), op. 213
Brahms, Walzer, op. 39
Brahms, Liebeslieder-Walzer, op. 52
Johann Strauss, jr., An der schönen blauen Donau
Johann Strauss, jr., Künstlerleben
Johann Strauss, jr., Geschichten aus der Wiener-Wald
Josef Strauss, Mein Lebenslauf ist Lieb’ und Lust, op. 263
Eduard Strauss, Das Leben ist doch schön, op. 150
Tchaikovsky, The Nutcracker, Waltz of the Flowers
Fauré, Dolly-Suite, Kitty-Valse
Chaminade, Valse-Caprice, op. 33
Debussy, Valse romantique
Victor Herbert, The Only Girl (1914), Overture